Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ulises Blanch vs Petr Bar Biryukov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Blanch vs Biryukov analysis and find out who is favored!
Ulises Blanch vs Petr Bar Biryukov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Blanch 0 - 0 Biryukov
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Blanch has won 48.16% of points on their second serve, while Biryukov has won 49.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Blanch, in recent form, has won 54.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Biryukov has won 44.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.95% and 30.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Blanch has saved 68.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Biryukov has saved 58.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Blanch has won 64.1% of matches played (W/L 25/ 14), with Biryukov winning 52.08% (W/L 25/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 86/ 80). Biryukov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 18/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 12/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 18/ 11), where as Biryukov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Blanch has played against opponents with an average rank of 241.9 while Biryukov has played against players with an average rank of 155.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Blanch has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Biryukov has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Blanch has converted 37.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Biryukov has converted 34.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
458
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
784
Rank
782
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
53% (215-188)
Career Total W/L
55% (83-68)
76% (13-4)
YTD W/L
43% (10-13)
$54,150
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ulises Blanch | Petr Bar Biryukov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (13/4) | 43% (10/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (26/13) | 46% (24/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (204/176) | 48% (240/256) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 45% (10/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.67 |
| Aces Total | 109 | 162 |
| DFs per game | 0.54 | 0.51 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 123 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 256.24 | 124.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (720/1264) | 61% (892/1464) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (530/720) | 71% (632/892) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (262/544) | 49% (282/572) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (52/138) | 35% (47/136) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (503/1259) | 35% (533/1509) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (6/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 47% (9/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (13/17) | 43% (10/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (11/0) |
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
11
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Lautaro Midon
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Saba Purtseladze
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
18
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Petr Bar Biryukov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
40%
(
16 of
40)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Ilia Simakin
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Aleksandre Metreveli
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Daniil Glinka
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
81 of
107)
17
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Christopher Bulus
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Finley Hall
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
4
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Blanch Vs Biryukov Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Blanch are available here and Biryukov photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
